close search

Establishing a paediatric critical care core quality measure set using a multistakeholder, consensus-driven process.

Schults JA, Charles KR, Millar J, Rickard CM, Chopra V, Lake A, Gibbons K, Long D, Rahiman S, Hutching K, Winderlich J, Spotswood NE, Johansen A, Secombe P, Pizimolas GA, Tu Q, Waak M, Allen M, McMullan B, Hall L, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group

VIEW FULL ARTICLE
  • Journal Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine

  • Published 25 Mar 2024

  • Volume 26

  • ISSUE 2

  • Pagination 71-79

  • DOI 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.01.002

Abstract

Monitoring healthcare quality is challenging in paediatric critical care due to measure variability, data collection burden, and uncertainty regarding consumer and clinician priorities.

We sought to establish a core quality measure set that (i) is meaningful to consumers and clinicians and (ii) promotes alignment of measure use and collection across paediatric critical care.

We conducted a multi-stakeholder Delphi study with embedded consumer prioritisation survey. The Delphi involved two surveys, followed by a consensus meeting. Triangulation methods were used to integrate survey findings prior tobefore the consensus meeting. In the consensus panel, broad agreement was reached on a core measure set, and recommendations were made for future measurement directions in paediatric critical care.

Australian and New Zealand paediatric critical care survivors (aged >18 years) and families were invited to rank measure priorities in an online survey distributed via social media and consumer groups. A concurrent Delphi study was undertaken with paediatric critical care clinicians, policy makers, and a consumer representative.

None.

Priorities for quality measures.

Respondents to the consumer survey (n = 117) identified (i) nurse-patient ratios; (ii) visible patient goals; and (iii) long-term follow-up as their quality measure priorities. In the Delphi process, clinicians (Round 1 n = 191; Round 2 n = 117 [61% retention]; Round 3 n = 14) and a consumer representative reached broad agreement on a 51-item (61% of 83 initial measures) core measure set. Clinician priorities were (i) nurse-patient ratio; (ii) staff turnover; and (iii) long term-follow up. Measure feasibility was rated low due to a perceived lack of standardised case definitions or data collection burden. Five recommendations were generated.

We defined a 51-item core measurement set for paediatric critical care, aligned with clinician and consumer priorities. Next steps are implementation and methodological evaluation in quality programs, and where appropriate, retirement of redundant measures.