Publications & Reports

Treatment scale-up to achieve global HCV incidence and mortality elimination targets: a cost-effectiveness model.

Scott N, McBryde ES, Thompson A, Doyle JS, Hellard ME
Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.


AIMS: The WHO’s draft HCV elimination targets propose an 80% reduction in incidence and a 65% reduction in HCV-related deaths by 2030. We estimate the treatment scale-up required and cost-effectiveness of reaching these targets among injecting drug use (IDU)-acquired infections using Australian disease estimates. METHODS: A mathematical model of HCV transmission, liver disease progression and treatment among current and former people who inject drugs (PWID). Treatment scale-up and the most efficient allocation to priority groups (PWID or patients with advanced liver disease) were determined; total healthcare and treatment costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) compared with inaction were calculated. RESULTS: 5662 (95% CI 5202 to 6901) courses per year (30/1000 IDU-acquired infections) were required, prioritised to patients with advanced liver disease, to reach the mortality target. 4725 (3278-8420) courses per year (59/1000 PWID) were required, prioritised to PWID, to reach the incidence target; this also achieved the mortality target, but to avoid clinically unacceptable HCV-related deaths an additional 5564 (1959-6917) treatments per year (30/1000 IDU-acquired infections) were required for 5 years for patients with advanced liver disease. Achieving both targets in this way cost $A4.6 ($A4.2-$A4.9) billion more than inaction, but gained 184 000 (119 000-417 000) QALYs, giving an ICER of $A25 121 ($A11 062-$A39 036) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving WHO elimination targets with treatment scale-up is likely to be cost-effective, based on Australian HCV burden and demographics. Reducing incidence should be a priority to achieve both WHO elimination goals in the long-term.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution to this work through project funding from the Victorian Infectious Diseases Service Special Purpose Fund at Melbourne Health, and support to the Burnet Institute provided by the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program. NS is the recipient of a Burnet Institute Jim and Margaret Beever fellowship; MEH, JSD, AT and EMB are the recipients of National Health and Medical Research Council fellowships.

A link to the full text of this article is on the right side of this page.

A Supplement to this article is available for download from


  • HCV Elimination Modelling
    Providing evidence-based policy recommendations for prevention, testing and treatment of Hepatitis C.


  • Journal: Gut
  • Published: 01/03/2017
  • Volume: 66
  • Issue: 8
  • Pagination: 1507-1515



Health Issue